Deadline: Act Quickly to Take Advantage of Tax Savings

Direct your Georgia income tax dollars to private elementary and high schools (receive dollar for dollar tax credit for amounts contributed to charity) and still get a federal tax deduction to save more federal tax.  If you itemize, this is a “no brainer”!

Georgia Statute 48-7-29.16 establishes an income tax credit for taxpayer funds used to support a qualifying student scholarship organization.    Two examples are the Georgia GOAL Scholarship Program for 107 of Georgia’s private schools and the  GRACE Scholar program for Catholic Schools in Georgia.  A full listing of all student scholarship organizations can be found at the Georgia Department of Education’s website at

http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/DMGetDocument.aspx/May 2, 2011 SSO List.pdf?p=6CC6799F8C1371F62F852EB6D75299360D76B6C7ABA0F68A8B177675F78FA12A&Type=D

Participants can give up to $1,000 per individual or $2,500 for married taxpayers filing a joint return.   For each dollar given, Participants will get a dollar of credit against their Georgia income taxes.  In addition, Participant’s, depending on their circumstances (whether they itemize or are subject to the AMT), may be entitled to take federal charitable deduction for the contribution.     For example, if a Participant contributes $1,000, she will get a $1,000 credit against her Georgia taxes and possibly a $1,000 charitable deduction for federal income tax purposes.

There is virtually no downside to taking this credit.  The Georgia credit allows you to simply redirect taxes you would otherwise pay to a scholarship program of your choice.  The federal charitable contribution deduction may reduce your federal taxes.  This is a no lose proposition.

To take advantage, Participants must fill out Georgia Department of Revenue Form IT-QEE-TP1 (see  https://etax.dor.ga.gov/inctax/2008_forms/TSD_HB-1133_FORM_IT-QEE-TP1.pdf) and submit it by November 1st (in order to assure that you will receive your confirmation back from the State of Georgia timely).    The participant should receive a confirmation that their contribution has been accepted.  Once received, the confirmation should be sent along with a check for the contribution amount to the scholarship program of the Participant’s choice.

The Georgia Department of Revenue is required to provide pre-approval within 30 days of submission of the form.  Therefore, to ensure you have sufficient time to make your contribution by year end, submit your application to the Georgia Department of Revenue in early November.

The form takes about ten minutes to fill out.  If you need help, call Joe Nagel in our office.  This is one of those tax items that is “too good to be true” but it works!

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax information contained in this communication, including attachments, was not written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.  If you would like a written opinion

Beneficiary Designation Forms

This is a reminder to clients of the importance of executing designated beneficiary forms for your retirement plan accounts.    If no designated beneficiary form is executed, the plan administrator will determine who receives the death benefit based on the plan document, which often names the spouse, or, if none, then the estate of the participant as the beneficiary.     Often these are not the best choices for the individual participant.  

Once executed, beneficiary designations should be reviewed every couple of years, particularly after life changing events such as marriage, divorce, or the birth or death of a family member.  Failure to do so can be catastrophic.  For example, in Kennedy v. Dupont, a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case, a participant selected his wife as the sole designated beneficiary of his retirement plan account.   The couple divorced and the spouse waived her right to the retirement benefits under the divorce decree.  The participant later passed away, but never changed the designated beneficiary form.  The Supreme Court found that the ex-spouse had the right to receive the death benefit from the participant’s account despite her waiver.    

If you would like help regarding the tax and other consequences of choosing a designated beneficiary, please contact Joe Nagel at (404) 255-7400 ext. 16.

55K IRS Penalty Abatement

H&A recently obtained an abatement of $55k of late filing and late payment penalties owed by a taxpayer.  The penalties were assessed for tax years 2006 and 2007, and the taxes were not paid until 2010.  

We cannot guaranty abatement of penalties, and success or failure of any request for abatement of penalties depends on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.  If you need help dealing with the IRS, please do not hesitate to contact us at (404) 255-7400.

56K Penalty Abatement

H&A has again successfully obtained an abatement of penalties.  In this case, the client was assessed penalties for late payment of taxes.  The CPA filed a request for abatement, which was denied by the IRS.  On appeal of the denial of the abatement request, H&A was able to obtain an abatement of 6 months worth of penalties in the amount of $56,000.  

We cannot guaranty abatement of penalties, and success or failure of any request for abatement of penalties will depend on the facts and circumstances of the individual case.  If you need help dealing with the IRS, please do not hesitate to contact us at (404) 255-7400.

$103,000 Penalty Abatement

H&A has again successfully helped obtain abatement of an IRS penalty.  In this case, the estate failed to file a return due to accountant error.  The CPA who caught the mistake filed an estate tax return for the client within a reasonable time after identification of the error.  Despite there being obvious reasonable cause for the late filing, the IRS agent obstinately assessed a late filing penalty of over $103,000.  H&A consulted on the case and drafted the protest letter which was accepted by the IRS Appeals Officer.  

We cannot guaranty abatement of penalties, and success or failure of any request for abatement of penalties will be based on the facts and circumstances of the individual case.  If you need help dealing with the IRS, please do not hesitate to contact us at (404) 255-7400.

Urgent: Update Your Non-Compete Agreements to Take Advantage of New Law

Until now, there were no clear rules governing “non-competes” (a provision typically found in  employment agreements and similar contracts that restrict one parties ability to compete against the other) in Georgia except for a hodge podge of case law that made it extremely difficult for employers to rely on non-competes.  In December 2009 the Georgia Legislature passed HB 173 to govern enforcement of restrictive covenants in the commercial arena.    However, the Legislature conditioned HB 173’s effectiveness upon the public’s passage of a constitutional amendment.  That constitutional amendment passed on November 2, 2010.

The new law is not retroactive.  It will not apply to non-competes entered into before November 2, 2010.   So if employers want to take advantage of the new law, they should update their non-compete agreements and non-disclosure/confidentiality agreements now.

The new law offers many advantages for employers.

  • The new law allows courts to adjust or “blue pencil” overly broad covenants to make them reasonable and enforceable.  Previously, a court didn’t have this discretion – if the covenant was overly broad for any reason, no matter how minor, the covenant was held to be totally unenforceable.
  • The new law allows employers to identify specific competitors as prohibited employers during the period of the non-compete.
  • The new law provides that post-employment restrictions are enforceable if they give “fair notice of the maximum reasonable scope of the restraint… event if the description is generalized or could possibly be stated more narrowly to exclude extraneous matters”.  The statute also specifically provides a good faith safe harbor for “any good faith estimate of the activities, products and services or geographical areas that may be applicable at the time of termination”.  So now the employer may make reasonable assumptions about the role and geographical area of the employee at the outset and the non-compete will not be struck down as overly broad if those assumptions turn out to be mistaken.
  • The new law includes a provision stating that trade secrets and other confidential information are legitimate business interests which support non-compete covenants.
  • The new law provides that a restrictive covenant during the term of employment will not be  unreasonable because it lacks any specific limitation upon scope of activity, duration, or geographical area as long as it promotes or protects the purpose or subject matter of the agreement or relationship or deters any potential conflict of interest.    Previously, that was not the case in Georgia  –  covenants during the term of employment were subject to strict scrutiny just like those applying after the term of employment.
  • The new law does away with Georgia’s “all or nothing” approach.  Under the old rules, if one part of an employment agreement contained an unenforceable restrictive covenant, all other restrictive covenants in the agreement were unenforceable.  This is no longer the case.
  • The new law allows confidential information to remain protected as long as it remains confidential.  Previously, Georgia was one of two states that required a non-disclosure agreement to have a time limit, except as relates to trade-secrets.   Under the new statute confidential information is not required to have an expiration date.

If you have questions or want to update your non-compete agreement, please contact Joe Nagel, Marc Dearth or Patrick Norris at (404) 255-7400.

Year End Tax Update

There is a lot of uncertainty this year over what’s happening with taxes.  There are still steps you can take, however, to minimize your 2010 tax liability.  Please remember that most tax-saving provisions require planning and execution before year-end. We are ready to help you plan efficiently and effectively.

Federal Residential Energy Property Credit

Energy Efficient Improvements Tax Credit – You can receive a tax credit of 30% of the purchase price of qualified energy-efficient products, up to a maximum tax credit of $1,500. The $1,500 maximum applies to the total amount of credits claimed for the years 2009 and 2010 combined. That means your tax credits for energy-efficient improvements cannot exceed a total of $1,500 over both 2009 and 2010.

The following improvements are eligible for the tax credit:

  • Insulation materials and systems designed to reduce a home’s heat loss or gain;
  • Exterior doors and windows (including skylights) ;
  • Pigmented metal roofs designed to reduce heat gain, and asphalt roofs with appropriate cooling granules;
  • Electric heat pump water heaters;
  • Electric heat pumps;
  • Central air conditioners;
  • Natural gas, propane or oil water heaters;
  • Natural gas, propane or oil furnace or hot water boilers;
  • Advanced main air circulating fans; and
  • Biomass stoves that use “plant-derived fuel available on a renewable or recurring basis, including agricultural crops and trees, wood and wood waste and residues (including wood pellets), plants (including aquatic plants), grasses, residues, and fibers”.

Individual Tax Changes

The tax provisions enacted in 2001 and 2003–commonly referred to collectively as the “Bush tax cuts”–expire at the end of the year. While it’s probable that new legislation will extend some or all of these expiring tax provisions, election-year politics make it difficult to predict what action, if any, Congress will take. President Obama has said that he wants the cuts extended only for those taxpayers with less than $250,000 in income. With that in mind, here’s what you need to know about the major changes that are scheduled for 2011.

Federal income tax brackets Currently, there are six income tax brackets: 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. As it stands now, there will be no 10% bracket for 2011, and the remaining bracket rates will return to their original 2001 levels: 15%, 28%, 31%, 36%, and 39.6%.

For 2010, there is no phase-out of personal exemptions and the 3% limitation on itemized deductions does not apply.

Therefore, accelerating income into 2010 and deferring tax-deductible expenses to at least 2011 could lead to tax savings.  Careful consideration should be made, however, when deferring charitable donations, estimated state tax payments and other discretionary deductions to 2011 given that the limitation on itemized deductions for individuals is expected to return.  The Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) should also be taken into account.

If you have a net operating loss (NOL), instead of carrying the loss back to previous years, it may be more beneficial to carry the loss forward in order to offset income in higher tax years.

Capital Gains/Qualified Dividend Tax RatesFor 2010, if you sell shares of stock that you’ve held for more than a year, any gain is a long-term capital gain, generally taxed at a maximum rate of 15%. If you’re in the 10% or 15% marginal income tax bracket, however, you’ll pay no federal tax on the long-term gain (a 0% tax rate applies). That means if you’re a married couple filing a joint federal income tax return, and your taxable income is $68,000 or less, you pay no federal tax on the gain.

However, these rates are due to expire at the end of 2010. Beginning in 2011, an expected 20% rate will generally apply to long-term capital gains. Individuals in the 15% tax bracket (remember, there won’t be a 10% bracket in 2011) will pay the tax at a rate of 10%. Special rules (and slightly lower rates) will apply for qualifying property held for five years or more. Finally, while qualifying dividends are taxed in 2010 using the same capital gains tax rates described above (i.e., 15% and 0%), in 2011 they’ll be taxed as ordinary income subject to the increased 2011 tax brackets.

Since the long-term capital gains tax rate is expected to increase, it may be beneficial to sell appreciated long-term securities or other assets in 2010.  You may also benefit from postponing tax loss harvesting until 2011 since the losses could be used to offset long-term capital gains at a tax rate of potentially 20 percent versus only 15 percent in 2010.

Consider a Roth IRA ConversionStarting in 2010, taxpayers of all income levels have been given the option to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. Roth IRAs provide several advantages over traditional IRAs, the biggest ones being the potential for tax-free income in retirement (especially since tax rates are expected to rise) and the fact that Roth IRAs do not require minimum distributions at age 70 ½.

By default, upon conversion 50 percent of the IRA’s value is reported on your 2011 tax return and the remaining 50 percent on your 2012 return. However, you can elect to pick up 100 percent of the value on your 2010 return, which allows you to pay taxes at the lower ordinary income tax rate.

Tax Changes for Small Businesses

Bonus Depreciation – The Small Business Jobs Act expands bonus depreciation for one year. This tax deduction enables a business to expense fifty percent of the cost of new equipment, such as computers or software, in the year of purchase. The remaining cost is depreciated over the normal life of the equipment.

Section 179 Deduction – The section 179 deduction will have a maximum deduction amount of $500,000 for the years 2010 and 2011 under the Small Business Jobs Act.

Cell Phones – Business owners will no longer have to keep track of individual calls on their cell phone plans. The Small Business Jobs Act removes the listed property classification from cell phones and mobile telephone service.

Start-up Expenses – Entrepreneurs have long depended on the start-up expense deduction, whereby the first $5,000 of expenses incurred before a business actually begins can be deducted in full once the business opens its doors for business. The Small Business Act expands this deduction to $10,000 for the year 2010 only.

Health Insurance Deduction – Self-employed people can now deduct the cost of their own health insurance as a business expense that will reduce their self-employment tax. This tax reducing provision is valid only for the year 2010. For 2009 and presumably for 2011, the deduction for health insurance is an above-the-line adjustment that reduces the regular income tax but does not reduce the self-employment tax.

Increased 1099 Reporting – Beginning in 2012, taxpayers with business income must issue 1099 forms to all vendors from whom they purchase more than $600 worth of goods and services that year.

Estate, Gift And Generation Skipping Transfer Tax

There is currently no estate tax for 2010, and special rules are in place that govern the way basis is calculated for property passing upon death. The estate tax is scheduled to reappear in 2011, however, with a $1 million exclusion amount (meaning that up to $1 million of assets will be exempt from estate tax) and a top tax rate of 55%. To put that in context, for 2009, the top estate tax rate was 45%, and estates received an exclusion of $3.5 million.

Year 2009 2010 2011
Estate tax exclusion $3.5 million N/A $1 million
Top estate tax rate 45% No tax 55%

The annual gift tax exclusion for 2010 is $13,000 (couples can give $26,000).  If you are considering gifting assets over that amount, doing so in 2010 while the gift tax rate is at a historically low 35 percent and, in certain circumstances, asset values are depressed, could lead to significant transfer tax savings. Gifting essentially reduces the value of your taxable estate and allows the gifted assets to grow in the hands of your beneficiaries outside your taxable estate.

The window for establishing short-term grantor retained annuity trusts (“GRATs”) may be closing as Congress has introduced several bills incorporating proposals to limit this valuable planning strategy. Under these proposals, the minimum term for establishing GRATs would be ten years, which decreases the flexibility of this favored transfer strategy. This probable Congressional limitation, coupled with today’s historically low interest rates, makes this the time to take action for those individuals interested in transferring significant wealth to their families.

The generation skipping transfer (“GST”) tax which is levied on asset transfers to generations two or more levels younger than the taxpayer (i.e., grandchildren) is currently dormant. In other words, the GST tax rate is 0 percent for 2010. Therefore, if you are considering gifting assets to your grandchildren, now may be the time. Care should be taken to avoid making such gifts to trusts or UGMA/UTMA accounts, however, since there are concerns that distributions from those accounts may become subject to GST tax in the future.

An important item to note when making gifts this year is the possibility that Congress could reinstate the higher gift tax rate and/or the GST tax retroactively to January 1, 2010 which would create tax liabilities for transfers or bequests that have already taken place.

Other Important Changes

Other changes for 2011 include:

Phase-out of itemized deductions and exemption amounts–Itemized deductions and personal exemption amounts will once again be phased out for higher-income individuals.

The “marriage penalty” returns--Changes made to correct the federal income tax “marriage penalty” expire at the end of 2010, resulting in a reduced standard deduction amount and lower tax bracket thresholds (i.e., higher rates will apply at lower income levels) for married couples filing jointly in 2011.

Tax credits get cut–The child tax credit will be reduced and both the Hope education tax credit and the earned income tax credit become less generous (the Making Work Pay tax credit also disappears).

Other Items of Note

Charitable Contributions – In order to deduct gifts to charity, you must have a receipt showing the organization’s name, the date of the donation, and the amount of the contribution.

IRS “Phishing” Scams – The IRS is warning consumers that another phishing scam is actively soliciting victims. If you receive e-mail from the IRS asking for information, delete it. The IRS does not send out unsolicited e-mails asking for personal information.

Flexible Spending Account (FSA) Changes – Beginning in 2011, FSA funds cannot be used for over-the-counter medicines unless specifically prescribed by a doctor. Currently, FSA funds can be used for OTC drugs and other items such as eyeglasses, contact solution, bandages and non-prescription forms of birth control.

E-Filing – Beginning with the 2010 filing season, we will be required to e-file most tax returns.  This is going to be a benefit to our clients.  All records can now be stored and sent to you on CD, and your return can be signed from anywhere.  We will provide you with more details soon!

What’s Coming

Health Care Reform – The Health Care reform bill contains new tax provisions which will take effect in 2013.  Singles earning more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 (in modified adjusted gross income) will pay an extra 0.9 percent of their wage income. In addition there is an entirely new tax of 3.8 percent on investment income.

Stock Basis Reporting – The IRS is requiring reporting of basis and other information by stockbrokers and mutual fund companies for most stock purchased in 2011 and all stock purchased in 2012 and later.  Form 1099-B, Proceeds From Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions, will be expanded in 2011 to include the cost or other basis of stock and mutual fund shares sold or exchanged during the year, and stockbrokers and mutual fund companies will use Form 1099-B to report this information at year-end. They will also use the expanded form to report whether gain or loss realized on these transactions qualifies as long-term or short-term gain or loss.

H&A obtains Release of Wrongful Levy by IRS

In this case, taxpayers had a 1.5 million dollar lien against them individually for past due personal income taxes and penalties.  Taxpayers owned a limited liability company which ran an operating business. The IRS attempted to place a levy on the limited liability company’s bank account to satisfy the lien.  The levy would have catastrophic consequences for the operating business and the livelihoods of those who work for or do business with the company, including taxpayers.  H&A prepared a request for removal of the wrongful levy, which was eventually accepted by the IRS.    Thanks to the efforts of our team, the limited liability company was able to continue operations, and those affiliated with the company were largely unaffected. 

We cannot guaranty success in a wrongful levy claim.  The success or failure of a wrongful levy claim will depend on the facts and circumstances of each separate case.  If you need help dealing with the IRS, please do not hesitate to contact us at (404) 255-7400.

H&A Wins Self Dealing Penalty Abatement

The IRS confronted our client with an assessment of over $700,000 in self dealing transaction penalties under Internal Revenue Code Section 4941 for its dealings with a private foundation.  H&A obtained a full abatement of the assessed penalties through hard work,  creative thinking, and attention to detail.  This was a collaborative effort by our tax controversy team and is a testament to the wide ranging skills and knowledge offered to our clients.

We cannot guaranty abatement of penalties.   The success or failure of a request or claim for penalty abatement depends on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.  If you need help dealing with the IRS, please call or email Hoffman & Associates today at 404.255.7400.

1 2 3 4